[Landmark Judgement] ONGC V. GETC (2017) 

Landmark Judgment Law Insider (1)

Published on: 20 July 2023 at 11:08 IST

Court: Supreme Court

Citation: ONGC V. GETC (2017)

Honourable Supreme Court of India has held that Article 142 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked where there is a specific provision of law already present in the legislation. It is held that Article 142 of the Constitution of India can be invoked in the cases where the legislation is silent and no appropriate judicial guidance is available on record of the judicial forum.

15. From the aforesaid decisions, it is clear as crystal that the Constitution Bench in Supreme Court Bar Assn. has ruled that there is no conflict of opinion in Antulay case or in Union Carbide Corpn. case with the principle set down in Prem Chand Garg v. Excise Commr. Be it noted, when there is a statutory command by the legislation as regards limitation and there is the postulate that delay can be condoned for a further period not exceeding sixty days, needless to say, it is based on certain underlined, fundamental, general issues of public policy as has been held in Union Carbide Corpn. case.

As the pronouncement in Chhattisgarh SEB lays down quite clearly that the policy behind the Act emphasising on the constitution of a special adjudicatory forum, is meant to expeditiously decide the grievances of a person who may be aggrieved by an order of the adjudicatory officer or by an appropriate Commission.

The Act is a special legislation within the meaning of Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act and, therefore, the prescription with regard to the limitation has to be the binding effect and the same has to be followed regard being had to its mandatory nature. To put it in a different way, the prescription of limitation in a case of present nature, when the statute commands that this Court may condone the further delay not beyond 60 days, it would come within the ambit and sweep of the provisions and policy of legislation. It is equivalent to Section 3 of the Limitation Act. Therefore, it is uncondonable and it cannot be condoned taking recourse to Article 142 of the Constitution.

Drafted By Abhijit Mishra

Related Post