Under What circumstances digital Signature Certificate can be Revoked?

By Tanushree Dubey

Published on: October 8, 2023 at 10:09 IST

Digital signatures play an essential role in ensuring secure electronic transactions, but circumstances may arise where the revocation of a digital signature becomes imperative, be it due to a compromise of security, expiration, or voluntary revocation. This article offers a comprehensive overview of what digital signatures are, what is their purpose, under what circumstances the digital signature certificate can be revoked and the role of certifying authority under the Information Technology Act, of 2000.

What are digital signatures?

The definition under Section 2(1)(ta), Information Technology Act, 2000 as follows:

“Electronic signature” means authentication of any electronic record by a subscriber by means of the electronic technique specified in the Second Schedule and includes digital signature.

Digital Signatures serve as electronic counterparts to conventional handwritten signatures, playing a key role in guaranteeing the legitimacy, integrity, and non-repudiation of electronic documents. They provide a secure way to substantiate the identity of the signer and warrant that the content remains unchanged during electronic transmission.

In India, the Information Technology Act, of 2000 govern the electronic signature. This legislative framework establishes the legal basis for the adoption, management, and revocation of digital signatures within the country. By providing a legal framework for digital signatures, the Information Technology Act, of 2000, helps instill confidence in the use of electronic documents and transactions in India, fostering the growth of secure and efficient digital communication and commerce

Purpose of digital signature?

The primary purpose of a digital signature is to establish a secure and trustworthy method for various purposes.

Firstly, it confirms the identity of the person or entity signing a digital document, ensuring that the individual or organization claiming to sign it is indeed the one doing so.

Secondly, digital signatures provide assurance regarding the integrity of the digital document by guaranteeing that it hasn’t undergone any unauthorized change or tampering since the moment of signing, which is important for maintaining the trustworthiness of the content.

Additionally, they serve the important role of preventing denials, as digital signatures create a strong legal and technical basis for proving the involvement of the signer and the authenticity of the signed document, making it difficult for them to later deny their actions.

In terms of efficiency and convenience, they streamline processes by eliminating the need for physical paperwork and in-person signatures, making transactions faster and more accessible. In sum, digital signatures serve as a fundamental tool to enhance security and trust in the realm of electronic documents.

Revocation of Digital Signature Certificate under Information Technology Act, 2000.

Digital Signature Certificates (DSCs) are basic tools for ensuring the security and authenticity of electronic transactions and communications in the digital age. However, the trustworthiness of these certificates must be maintained, and mechanisms for their revocation are essential to address various scenarios.

Section 38 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, provides a comprehensive framework for the revocation of Digital Signature Certificates, encompassing both voluntary and Certifying Authority (CA)-initiated revocation scenarios.

Section 38 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, delineates instances in which a Certifying Authority (CA) may voluntarily revoke a Digital Signature Certificate:

  • Subscriber’s Request: A Digital Signature Certificate may be revoked when the subscriber or an authorized representative thereof formally requests revocation. This provision underscores the principle of subscriber autonomy in managing their digital identity.
  • Subscriber’s Demise: In the unfortunate event of the subscriber’s death, the Certifying Authority is vested with the authority to initiate the revocation process. This measure is crucial for preventing the misuse of the deceased subscriber’s credentials.
  • Dissolution of Firm or Company: If the subscriber is an entity such as a firm or a company, and such entity undergoes dissolution or winding up, the CA is empowered to revoke the certificate. This provision ensures that DSCs associated with entities that cease to exist are invalidated appropriately.

Instances where Certifying Authority may Revoke:

Section 38, Subsection 2, of the Information Technology Act, 2000, confers upon Certifying Authorities the authority to revoke Digital Signature Certificates when certain conditions are met. These conditions are enumerated below:

  • False Information: A Digital Signature Certificate may be revoked if the Certifying Authority determines that a material fact represented in the certificate was false or had been intentionally concealed during the application process. This provision aims to maintain the integrity of information associated with DSCs.
  • Non-Compliance: Revocation can occur if the Certifying Authority discovers that the requirements stipulated for the issuance of the Digital Signature Certificate were not adequately met. This measure ensures that only individuals or entities meeting the requisite criteria are entrusted with DSCs.
  • Security Compromise: In cases where the Certifying Authority’s private key or security system, which supports the certificate’s reliability and integrity, has been compromised in a manner that materially affects the reliability of the certificate, revocation is permitted. This provision underscores the criticality of safeguarding the cryptographic infrastructure underpinning DSCs.
  • Subscriber Status: Revocation is permissible when the subscriber has been declared insolvent or deceased. In the context of entities such as firms or companies, if such entities are dissolved, wound up, or have otherwise ceased to exist, the Certifying Authority may revoke the corresponding DSCs. This measure serves to align DSCs with the changing legal and operational status of subscribers.

It is vital to emphasize that, regardless of the grounds for revocation, a Digital Signature Certificate shall not be revoked without first giving the subscriber an opportunity to be heard in the matter. This procedural safeguard ensures that revocation decisions are equitable and comply with the principles of natural justice.

Furthermore, upon the revocation of a Digital Signature Certificate in accordance with Section 38 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Certifying Authority is duty-bound to expeditiously communicate the revocation to the affected subscriber. This proactive notification mechanism is designed to maintain transparency and accountability in the digital authentication process.

In sum, the comprehensive framework for revocation articulated in Section 38 of the Information Technology Act of 2000, serves as a cornerstone for preserving the integrity of digital transactions and upholding the standards of trust and reliability that are imperative for secure electronic communications.

Revoking a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) in India involves several essential steps and considerations:

  • Revocation Request: The initial phase in revoking a DSC entails the certificate holder submitting a formal request for revocation to the respective Certifying Authority (CA). This request must include valid grounds for revocation, such as security compromise, expiration, or voluntary revocation.
  • Verification and Authentication: Once the CA receives the revocation request, it proceeds with a rigorous verification process to authenticate the legitimacy of the request. This step serves to prevent unauthorized or false revocations, ensuring the reliability and credibility of the revocation procedure.
  • Revocation Confirmation: Following the successful verification of the revocation request, the CA issues a formal revocation confirmation to the certificate holder. This confirmation serves as tangible proof that the DSC has been revoked, and it should no longer be considered valid for authentication or verification purposes.
  • Publication of Revocation Information: The CA then updates the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) with pertinent details regarding the revoked DSCs. This includes information like the certificate’s serial number, the date of revocation, and the grounds for revocation. The CRL functions as a publicly accessible repository that enables relying parties to verify the legitimacy of digital signatures.

Role of certifying authorities?

Certifying Authorities (CAs) play a pivotal role within the framework of Digital Signature Certificates in India. Governed by the Information Technology Act, 2000, these entities are entrusted with the essential tasks of both issuance and revocation of DSCs. Their responsibilities encompass meticulous identity verification of certificate applicants, ensuring the utmost security during the certificate issuance process, and the management of Certificate Revocation Lists (CRL).

In the issuance phase, Certifying Authorities diligently conduct comprehensive authentication and verification procedures for individuals, organizations, and government entities seeking DSCs. Through rigorous scrutiny, they confirm the identities of applicants and, upon successful completion of these processes, grant the much-needed Digital Signature Certificates.

Additionally, Certifying Authorities have a continuous role in maintaining the CRL. This critical document keeps a record of revoked certificates, reflecting the real-time status of these certificates through Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responses. By consistently updating the CRL, Certifying Authorities empower relying parties to determine the validity of digital signatures promptly and accurately, thus upholding the integrity of digital transactions and communications in India.

Conclusion

Revoking a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) in India is a structured process that operates under the legal provisions outlined in the Information Technology Act of 2000. This established legal framework, which actively engages Certifying Authorities, plays a pivotal role in upholding the trust, security, and reliability of electronic transactions. A comprehensive grasp of the revocation procedure becomes imperative for both individuals and organizations aiming to safeguard the authenticity and credibility of digital signatures within the Indian context.

Related Post