Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Alter Ego Principle in Arbitration: Non-Signatory Parties Potentially Bound by Arbitration Clause- ONGC Ltd. v. Discovery Enterprises (P) Ltd. (2022)

Landmark Judgment Law Insider (1)

Published on: April 08, 14:45 IST

Court: Supreme Court of India

Citation: ONGC Ltd. v. Discovery Enterprises (P) Ltd. (2022)

Honourable Supreme Court of India has explained application of Alter Ego Principle in arbitration making a party not assenting to a contract containing arbitration clause to be nevertheless bound by the clause if that party is “alter ego” of an entity who is a party to the arbitration agreement. It is held that a party who has not assented to a contract containing an arbitration clause may nonetheless be bound by the clause if that party is an “alter ego” of an entity that did execute, or was otherwise a party to, the agreement. It is held that non-signatory parties can be bound by the principle of direct estoppel to prohibit such a party from deriving the benefits of a contract while disavowing the obligations to arbitrate under the same contract.

40. In deciding whether a company within a group of companies which is not a signatory to arbitration agreement would nonetheless be bound by it, the law considers the following factors:

(i) The mutual intent of the parties;

(ii) The relationship of a non-signatory to a party which is a signatory to the agreement;

(iii) The commonality of the subject-matter;

(iv) The composite nature of the transaction; and

(v) The performance of the contract.”

Drafted By Abhijit Mishra

Related Post