[Landmark Judgement] Union of India V. Datta Linga Toshatwad (2005)

Landmark Judgment Law Insider (1)

Published on: 10 August 2023 at 15:25 IST

Court: Supreme Court 

Citation: Union of India V. Datta Linga Toshatwad (2005)

Honourable Supreme Court of India has held that officers of Uniformed Forces cannot absent themselves on frivolous pleas. It is held that such indiscipline in Armed forces is a serious matter and considered as Desertion. It is held that when the cases of desertion by the member of the Armed Forces then dismissal from the Armed force is a justified disciplinary action.

8. The present case is not a case of a constable merely overstaying his leave by 12 days. The respondent took leave from 16-6-1997 and never reported for duty thereafter. Instead he filed a writ petition before the High Court in which the impugned order has been passed.

Members of the uniformed forces cannot absent themselves on frivolous pleas, having regard to the nature of the duties enjoined on these forces. Such indiscipline, if it goes unpunished, will greatly affect the discipline of the forces. In such forces desertion is a serious matter.

Cases of this nature, in whatever manner described, are cases of desertion particularly when there is apprehension of the member of the force being called upon to perform onerous duties in difficult terrains or an order of deputation which he finds inconvenient, is passed. We cannot take such matters lightly, particularly when it relates to uniformed forces of this country. A member of a uniformed force who overstays his leave by a few days must be able to give a satisfactory explanation.

However, a member of the force who goes on leave and never reports for duties thereafter, cannot be said to be one merely overstaying his leave. He must be treated as a deserter. He appears on the scene for the first time when he files a writ petition before the High Court, rather than reporting to his Commanding Officer. We are satisfied that in cases of this nature, dismissal from the force is a justified disciplinary action and cannot be described as disproportionate to the misconduct alleged.

Drafted By Abhijit Mishra

Related Post