[Landmark Judgement] UMC Technologies (P) Ltd. V. Food Corpn. of India (2021) 

Landmark Judgment Law Insider (1)

Published on: 12 August 2023 at 18:08 IST

Court: Supreme Court 

Citation: UMC Technologies (P) Ltd. V. Food Corpn. of India (2021) 

Honourable Supreme Court of India has held that blacklisting of a person or an entity by the State requires a valid, particularised and unambiguous show-cause notice. It is held that Blacklisting has the effect of denying a person or an entity the privileged opportunity of entering into government contracts.

This privilege arises because it is the State who is the counterparty in government contracts and as such, every eligible person is to be afforded an equal opportunity to participate in such contracts, without arbitrariness and discrimination. Blacklisting also has long-lasting civil consequences for the future business prospects of the blacklisted person.

21. Thus, from the above discussion, a clear legal position emerges that for a show-cause notice to constitute the valid basis of a blacklisting order, such notice must spell out clearly, or its contents be such that it can be clearly inferred therefrom, that there is intention on the part of the issuer of the notice to blacklist the noticee.

Such a clear notice is essential for ensuring that the person against whom the penalty of blacklisting is intended to be imposed, has an adequate, informed and meaningful opportunity to show cause against his possible blacklisting.

25. The mere existence of a clause in the bid document, which mentions blacklisting as a bar against eligibility, cannot satisfy the mandatory requirement of a clear mention of the proposed action in the show-cause notice.

The Corporation’s notice is completely silent about blacklisting and as such, it could not have led the appellant to infer that such an action could be taken by the Corporation in pursuance of this notice. Had the Corporation expressed its mind in the show-cause notice to blacklist, the appellant could have filed a suitable reply for the same.

Therefore, we are of the opinion that the show-cause notice dated 10-4-2018 does not fulfil the requirements of a valid show-cause notice for blacklisting. In our view, the order of blacklisting the appellant clearly traversed beyond the bounds of the show-cause notice which is impermissible in law. As a result, the consequent blacklisting order dated 9-1-2019 cannot be sustained.

Drafted By Abhijit Mishra

Related Post