Supreme Court refuses to accept Prashant Bhushan’s regret

Aug10,2020
Contempt Case Against Prashant Bhushan LAW INSIDER INContempt Case Against Prashant Bhushan LAW INSIDER IN

LI Network

Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan expressed regret in a case of contempt over his remarks in a 2009 interview in which he called eight of the previous 16 CJIs were corrupt. The Supreme Court has refused to accept the Regret also said it needed to check whether ‘corrupt Chief Justices’ remark amounts to contempt of court.

Supreme Court will continue 11-year-old contempt case against Prashant Bhushan , the matter is fixed for hearing next Monday.

Today bench comprising justices BR Gavai and Krishna Murari and headed by Justice Arun Mishra, said that bench will hear the matter and decide the issue of whether the said comment on corruption against judges per se amounted to contempt or not.

On August 4, the Supreme Court had made clear to Prashant Bhushan and Tarun Tejpal, then editor of the magazine, that it would hear the case against them if it does not accept their “explanation” or “apology” in the case.

The Supreme Court in November 2009, had issued a contempt notice to Prashant Bhushan and Tarun Tejpal for allegedly casting aspersions on some sitting and former top court judges in an interview in 2009.

During the last hearing on August 4, the bench told senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for Prashant Bhushan that there was a thin line between freedom of speech and expression, and the contempt of court.

“You have stood for freedom of speech and expression but it may be the case that you might have crossed the thin line of contempt. How do we save the grace of this system? I want to know from you as an amicus so that we can avoid this conflict. Suggest us some way out as the system also belongs to you,” Supreme court to Lawyer.

Prashant Bhushan made a statement, That he had then said he used the word corruption in a wide sense meaning lack of propriety. “I did not mean only financial corruption or deriving any pecuniary advantage. If what I have said caused hurt to any of them or to their families in any way, I regret the same,” .

Related Post