By Arryan Mohanty
Published on: March 15, 2022 at 10:04 IST
Introduction
Child marriage has been a profound and exceptionally unmistakable issue in the Indian society. It is not just an action that disregards the law; however, it additionally terribly abuses the Human Rights of the children engaged with the marriage.
Child marriage has been polished to reduce the instructive and financial weight of the young lady child on her folks is as yet common in different States, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh being the significant states.
The Marriage of a young lady before the age of 18, and of a kid before the age of 21 can be negative towards them in different ways. Child marriage is an infringement of Human Rights.
Each child has the Privilege to be shielded from this Destructive Practice, which has devastating Ramifications for People and Society.
Annulment of child marriage is presently solidly on the Worldwide Development Plan, particularly through its incorporation in target 5.3 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which means to wipe out the training by 2030.
Also read: What is INTERPOL?
Notwithstanding orientation, marriage before adulthood is an infringement of the Rights of the child. The extent of this article is the difficulties looked to finish child marriage up, and furthermore the absence of mindfulness among individuals about child marriage.
On December 20, 2021, the Central Government introduced The Prohibition of Child Marriage Amendment Bill, 2021 in the Lok Sabha. The main goal of this law is to Raise the Legal Marriage Age for Women in India from 18 to 21.
Because the legal marriage age for Males in India is 21, the argument for this revision is to implement the Constitutional obligation of Gender Equality.
Union Women and Child Development Minister, Smriti Irani, presented this Bill expressing that it will be pertinent to all Standings and Religions. This act itself maintains the standards of the major Right to uniformity by keeping the marriage age 21 years of both Male and Female Residents.
This will augment instructive and word related open doors for women as it will give them more opportunity to get schooling or connect with themselves in work viewpoints as such normal honors are denied to an enormous level of women post marriage.
In such circumstances, men become the Sole suppliers of the family, and their Spouses are compelled to depend on their procuring husbands for Monetary help.
Also, enabling women by further developing their Nourishment levels and bringing down the Maternal Death Rate was another Bill. As per a segment study by the National Library of Medicine, the Maternal Mortality in 2020 alone was 23,800, 63% of passing happened in Country Regions.
In addition, proof from a concentrate by Ann Blanc showed that women after the age of 18 are demonstrated to be nearly better and more supported, which normally diminishes the Maternal Death Rate.
Also, the 18th Law Commission headed by Justice Arunachalam R. Lakshmanan stated that Men and Women’s Legal Marriageable Ages should be set at 18 years old so that they can marry as equals, and the requirement that consenting adults marry at different ages should be ‘Abolished.’
The Centre cited the 2017 Supreme Court Judgement while proposing to fix 21 years as the uniform period of marriage for people, as per individuals mindful of the matter.
In the Judgement, the Supreme Court observed, “Law cannot be obstinate and Static. It needs to Advance and Change with the necessities of Society“.
Perceiving these Elements, the Parliament expanded the base age for marriage.
It held, “The State is qualified and enabled to fix the Time of Assent. The State can make sensible grouping yet while making any arrangement it should show that the characterization has been made with the object of accomplishing a specific end. The arrangement should have a sensible Nexus with the item tried to be accomplished”.
Objective of the Bill
The main reason of the Bill highlights that it looks to Address the issues of women in an extensive manner, as an activity for supporting the place of women.
The Bill by all appearances tries to build the office of women as expressed by the Parliamentary Standing Committee. Notwithstanding, the disputable inquiry which looms here is whether expanding the marriageable age will stop the underage marriages occurring the Nation over time.
Numerous Researchers, Academicians like Zakia Soman (who faced the conflict against Triple Talaq) have thought that these lawful changes alone are not sufficiently adequate to empower an equitable and safe climate for women.
Specialists have gone against the choice on the ground that the law to end child marriage will not emerge as the decrease in number of child marriages is peripheral.
Moreover, they called attention to those instances of girl child exiting school inferable from early marriage and uncovering those numerous young women are regularly without essential training.
Notwithstanding, intellectuals have since raised an enormous number of Secret issues – Social shame, Destitution, Raised demand for endowments, that drives women into an early marriage.
They have moreover said that the law as yet has not been adequately successful in thwarting child marriages.
Therefore, it might be plausible that this may possibly be a handy answer for a perplexing issue that requires a more granular point of view, starting from adjustments in the mentality and thoughts of the overall Population and Society.
Experts have moreover featured that in a country where between Station and between Strict Marriages could be demonstrated deadly, this law could turn into an instrument that can be utilised by little girls to Guarantee their Rights.
No matter what the benefits the Bill tries to propose on the platter, it stays indistinct whether this new legal time of marriage will achieve the ocean changes as expressed or regardless of whether 21 would turn out to be basically a number.
Proposed Bill
The Prohibition of Child Marriage Amendment Bill, 2021 intends to change Section 2(a) which states the definition of a ‘Child’ to ‘Male or female who has not reached twenty-one years of age.’
Both Men and Women will be able to marry at the same age under the Bill. This will aid in the improvement of Health and Social indices such as Infant Mortality, Maternal Mortality, and Maternal and Child Nutrition.
Substitution of the words 2 years with 5 years in Section 3(3) of the demonstration, which manages the child documenting a request for the cancellation of child marriage.
Post this revision, a child might document such a request just prior to finishing five years of accomplishing a larger part.
Inclusion of Section 14A in the demonstration states that these new changes will have a superseding impact in setting to the Current laws or Customs that might go against the Revisions.
The other individual and Marriage laws, for example, the Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act and the Foreign Marriage Act, Indian Christian Marriage Act, Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act and the Special Marriage Act will be corrected in like manner to be predictable with these new arrangements.
Additionally, the time limit for a ‘kid’ to file a Petition to have a child marriage declared void is extended. Section 3(4) of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act now allows a woman to apply for a declaration of voidance of a child marriage before she turns 20 and a man before he is 23.
The Bill proposes to extend this window to five years for both women and men after they reach the age of 18. Child marriages are not void but “voidable” under the law, despite the fact that they are Prohibited.
When either Party to a child marriage submits a Petition under Article 3(4) of the 2006 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, the court can declare the marriage null and void.
In legal terminology, a ‘Void’ marriage means that the marriage never took place. The Bill introduced a ‘notwithstanding’ clause, which states that regardless of Religious Customs, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act applies equally to all Religions.
Analysis of the Bill
Section 2 of the Bill defines that irrespective of any Law or Customary Practises that is in conflict with this Amendment, a Minor now applies to any male or female who has not reached the age of 21.
Section 3(3) of the bill, which relates with a Minor lodging an application for the dissolution of a child marriage is replaced with 5 years which was 2 years earlier.
After this change, a Minor can only lodge such a lawsuit before reaching the age of majority. The addition of Section 14A to the legislation specifies that these additional modifications will take precedence over any prior laws or customs that may coincide with them.
Bill’s first section establishes the Act’s Brief Title, Commencement, and Scope. Section 1(2) of the Bill has been changed to include a new statement.
It has been suggested that this remark be added after the words ‘Citizens of India without and beyond India.’ The goal of including this phrase was to make the law more consistent.
This statement was added in the act because India maintains a system where family rules are based on a Person’s Religion, and each Religion may have a different age for men and women to marry.
As a result, the law would take precedence over any conflicting provisions in Personal laws, according to this Bill. The opposition Party in Parliament, on the other hand, has expressed its displeasure.
According to reports, all stakeholders were not taken into account, and there was no thorough discussion.
Because various Personal and Religious laws have different perspectives on behaviours like marriage, they should be considered, and a proper debate should be held in accordance with this suggested amendment, as a lack of sufficient debate on the subject can lead to the law’s dysfunctionality.
The Current idea contradicts a number of other laws now in existence in our Country. The UN-Drafted 1962 Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage, and Marriage Registration establishes a minimum age for marriage that is enforced through Statutory legislation, superseding Customs, Religion, Tribal laws and Traditions requiring Marriage Registration.
Despite the fact that India is not a signatory to the accord, it has signed the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which cites the ‘Eradication of underage Marriage’ and specifies the same minimum marrying age for men and women.
It was suggested that the Special Marriage Act, the Indian Christian Marriage Act, the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, and the Foreign Marriage Act be changed.
The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, which Governs India’s Hindus, states that the Bride must be at least 18 years old and the groom must be at least 21 years old before they marry.
In Islam, it is permissible to marry a child who has reached Puberty. In a Country like India, an amendment that advises disregarding particular components of one’s faith or culture may face backlash.
With a population of 138 crores, the majority of whom live in Rural areas, it is understandable that many people have deep-seated habits and traditions that they refuse to modify.
Awareness is one of the most crucial factors in the implementation of such acts as Atrocities against SC/ST. Even if a sufficient amount of awareness is obtained, changing people’s perspectives can be challenging, and so execution can be tough as well.
The Revision of the definitions mentioned in Section 2 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act is addressed in Section 3 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill.
This Bill changes the legal definition of a kid to include a boy or a girl under the age of 21. It also seeks to equalize the marriage age for men and women by repealing any current statute, as well as any tradition, use, or practice governing the parties to a marriage.
According to the Bill, Section 3(3) will now be read as, ‘The Petition under this section may be filed at any time but before the child filing the Petition completes five years of attaining Majority.’
This was initially for two years after reaching the age of majority. Instead of two years, five years were replaced in the amendment.
The purpose of this amendment is to increase the time limit for declaring a marriage void after reaching majority to five years for both males and females.
Because both men and women have acquired the age of majority at 18, they can file a Petition to have the child marriage declared void before becoming 23, or two years after reaching the new minimum age of marriage.
Only the Concerned Party, i.e., the Minor Bride or Groom, can file a Petition to Annul their Marriage, according to the draft.
Only a Guardian or the married child’s next best friend (adult) with the support of the child marriage Prohibition officer for minors can file the Petition. Because, in the majority of instances, minors are married off by their guardians.
The same Guardians would never sanction the annulment. Another stumbling block will be that children will be unaware of such restrictions. As a result, men and women would have more time to end their marriage if they were unaware of the regulations.
Apart from that, there haven’t been many responses to this amendment.
Through the Bill, equal and unified marriage Rights are granted to all Women of all faiths, a step toward unified civil law.
Reaffirm the right to equality in terms of marriage age for men and women. Early marriage age and pregnancy have a substantial impact on mothers’ and children’s overall health and Psychological well-being, and must be addressed. A step in the Right direction towards Women’s Achievement.
Key Takeaways
- The Bill intends to Raise the Legal Age for Women to marry from 18 to 21 years old.
- This Bill also poses some significant obstacles. The Execution of this law, for example, will be problematic. When the law has been employed in the past, it has primarily been used to punish young adults who have entered into self-arranged marriages. It is apparent from historical evidence that the law against underage marriage does not work very well.
- Child marriage has decreased from 27 percent in 2015-16 to 23 percent in 2019-20, according to the National Family Health Survey. However, the current condition is unsatisfactory. Furthermore, 70 percent of early marriages occurred in underprivileged communities, such as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. If this law is enacted, it will only drive them underground rather than deter them.
- The Current Bill of 2021 changes the definition of a child to “a male or female who has not reached the age of twenty-one.” It supersedes Hindu, Muslim, Christian, and Parsi personal laws, as well as the Special Marriage Act of 1954.
- The Bill contradicts acts like POCSO, Right of Children to Compulsory and Free Education.
Conclusion
If we look at the history of the marriageable age in India, the first time it was mandated was in the Act of 1929, which was known at the time as the Sarda Act.
The Child Marriage Restraint Statute was later renamed after this act (CMRA). The minimum age for marriage was raised to 18 years for girls and 21 years for boys in 1978, when the law was amended.
Surprisingly, the status remained unchanged even after the CMRA, 1929, was replaced by the Prohibition of Child Marriages Act, 2006, in 2016. Education will have to be boosted by the government.
Since child marriage is a Social and Economic issue, many campaigners have stated that ensuring access to education is the key to delaying it. Furthermore, the government should improve school accessibility.
Girl’s access to Schools and Universities, as well as their Transportation to these Institutions, must be improved by the government.
Furthermore, the Government should launch a Mass Awareness Programme to make people aware of new legislation and persuade them to embrace the changes because they are for the benefit of the broader public.
According to the UNFPA’s State of the World Report 2020, 50 Percent of young women in India have no education, and 47 percent of those with only Primary school had married by the age of 18.
Furthermore, according to a study performed by the International Centre for Research on Women, girls who have dropped out of school are 3.4 times more likely to be married or already married than girls who are still in school.
The Proposed Bill contradicts some other laws too so that should be taken into consideration before taking any further steps.
Edited By: Advocate Komal Sharma, Publishing Editor at Law Insider.
References